CHRISTENDOM sends its missionaries
to Heathendom at an expense of millions drained from the pockets of would-be
pious folks, who court respectability. Thousands of homeless and penniless
old men, women and children are allowed to starve for lack of funds, for
the sake, perhaps, of one converted "heathen." All the spare
money of the charitable is absorbed by these dead-head travelling agents
of the Christian Church. What is the result? Visit the prison cells of
so-called Christian lands, crammed with delinquents who have been led
on to felony by the weary path of starvation, and you will have the answer.
Read in the daily papers the numerous accounts of executions, and you
will find that modern Christianity offers, perhaps unintentionally but
none the less surely, a premium for murder and other heinous crimes. Is
anyone prepared to deny the assertion? Remember that, while many a respectable
unbeliever dies in his bed with the comfortable assurance from his next
of kin, and good friends in general, that he is going to hell, the red-handed
criminal has but to believe at his eleventh hour that the blood of the
Saviour can and will save him, to receive the guarantee of his spiritual
adviser that he will find himself when launched into eternity in the bosom
of Christ, in heaven, and playing upon the traditional harp. Why, then,
should any Christian deny himself the pleasure and profit of robbing,
or even murdering, his richer neighbour? And such a doctrine is being
promulgated among the heathen at the cost of an annual expenditure of
millions.
But, in her eternal wisdom, Nature provides antidotes against moral as
well as against mineral and vegetable poisons. There are people who do
not content themselves with preaching grandiloquent discourses; they act.
If such books as Higgins Anacalypsis, and that extraordinary
work of an anonymous English authora bishop, it is whisperedentitled Supernatural Religion, cannot awaken responsive echoes among the
ignorant masses, other means can be, and are resorted tomeans more
effectual and which will bring fruit in the future, if hitherto prevented
by the crushing hand of ecclesiastical and monarchical despotism. Those
whom the written proofs of the fictitious character of biblical authority
cannot reach, may be saved by the spoken word. And this work of disseminating
the truth among the more ignorant classes is being ardently prosecuted
by an army of devoted scholars and teachers, simultaneously in India and
America.
The Theosophical Society has been of late so much spoken about; such
idle tales have been circulated about itits members being sworn
to secrecy and hitherto unable, even if willing, to proclaim the truth
about itthat the public may be gratified to know, at least, about
one portion of its work. It is now in organized affiliation with the Ârya
Samâj of India, its Western representative, and, so to say, under
the order of its chiefs. A younger Society than the Brâhmo Samâj,
it was instituted to save the Hindûs from exoteric idolatries, Brâhmanism
and Christian missionaries.
The purely Theistic movement connected with the Brâhmo Samâj
had its origin in the same idea. It began early in the present century,
but spasmodically and with interruption, and only took concrete shape
under the leadership of Baboo Keshub Chunder Sen in 1858. Rammohun Roy,
who may be termed the combined Fénélon and Thomas Paine
of Hindûstan, was its parent, his first church having been organized
shortly before his death in 1833. One of the greatest and most acute of
controversial writers that our century has produced, his works ought to
be translated and circulated in every civilized land. At his death, the
work of the Brâhmo Samâj was interrupted. As Miss Collett
says, in her Brahmo Year Book for 1878, it was only in October,
1839, that Debendra Nath Tagore founded the Tattvabodhini Sabhâ
(or Society for the Knowledge of Truth), which lasted for twenty years,
and did much to arouse the energies and form the principles of the young
church of the Brâhmo Samâj. But exoteric or open religion
as it is now, it must have been conducted at first much on the principles
of the secret societies, as we are informed that Keshub Chunder Sen, a
resident of Calcutta and a pupil of the Presidency College, who had long
before quitted the orthodox Brâhmanical Church and was searching
for a purely Theistic religion, " had never heard of the Brâhmo
Samâj before 1858" (see The Theistic Annual, 1878, p.
45).
Since then the Brâhmo Samâj, which he then joined, has flourished
and become more popular every day. We now find it with Samâjes established
in many provinces and cities. At least, we learn that in May, 1877, fifty
Samâjes have notified their adhesion to the Society and eight of
them have appointed their representatives. Native missionaries of the
Theistic religion oppose the Christian missionaries and the orthodox Brâhmans,
and the work is going on lively. So much for the Brâhmo movement.
And now, with regard to the Ârya Samâj, The Indian Tribune uses the following language in speaking of its founder:
The first quarter of the sixteenth century was no more an age of reformation
in Europe than the one we now live in is, at this moment, in India.
From amongst its own "Benedictines," Swamî Dyanand Saraswati
has arisen, who, unlike other reformers, does not wish to set up a new
religion of his own, but asks his countrymen to go back to the pristine
purity and Theism of their Vedic religion. After preaching his views
in Bombay, Poona, Calcutta, and the N.-W. Provinces, he came to the
Punjab last year, and here it is that he found the most congenial soil.
It was in the land of the five rivers, on the banks of the Indus, that
the Vedas were first compiled. It was the Punjab that gave birth to a
Nanak. And it is the Punjab that is making such efforts for a revival
of Vedic learning and its doctrines, And wherever Swamî Dyanand
goes, his splendid physique, his manly bearing, eloquence and his incisive
logic bear down all opposition. People rise up and say: We shall remain
no longer in this state for ourselves, we have had enough of a crafty
priesthood and a demoralizing idolatry, and we shall tolerate them no
longer. we shall wipe off the ugliness of ages, and try to shine forth
in the original radiance and effulgence of our Âryan ancestors.
The Svamî is a most highly honoured Fellow of the Theosophical
Society, takes a deep interest in its proceedings, and The Indian Spectator of Bombay, April 14th, 1878, spoke by the book when it said that the
work of Pundit Dyanand "bears intimate relation to the work of the
Theosophical Society."
While the members of the Brâhmo Samâj may be designated as
the Lutheran Protestants of orthodox Brâhmanism, the disciples of
the Svamî Dyanand should be compared to those learned mystics, the
Gnostics, who had the key to those earlier writings which, later, were
worked over into the Christian gospels and various patristic literature.
As the above-named pre-Christian sects understood the true esoteric meaning
of the Chrestos allegory, which is now materialized into the Jesus of
flesh, so the disciples of the learned and holy Svamî are taught
to discriminate between the written form and the spirit of the word preached
in the Vedas. And this is the principal point of difference
between the Ârya Samâj and the Brâhmos who, as it would
seem, believe in a personal God and repudiate the Vedas, while
the Âryas see an everlasting Principle, an impersonal Cause in the
great "Soul of the universe" rather than a personal being, and
accept the Vedas as supreme authority, though not of divine origin.
But we may better quote in elucidation of the subject what the President
of the Bombay Ârya Samâj, also a Fellow of the Theosophical
Society, Mr. Hurrychund Chintamon, says in a recent letter to our Society:
Pundit Dyanand maintains that as it is now universally acknowledged
that the Vedas are the oldest books of antiquity, if they contain
the truth and nothing but the truth in an unmutilated state, and nothing
new can be found in other works of later date, why should we not accept
the Vedas as a guide for Humanity? . . . A revealed book or revelation
is understood to mean one of two things, viz. (1) a book already written
by some invisible hand and thrown into the world; or (2) a work written
by one or more men while they were in their highest state of mental
lucidity, acquired by profound meditation upon the problems of who man
is, whence he came, whither he must go, and by what means he may emancipate
himself from worldly delusions and sufferings. The latter hypothesis
may be regarded as the more rational and correct.
Our Brother Hurrychund here describes those superior men whom we know
as Adepts. He adds:
The ancient inhabitants of a place near Thibet, and adjoining a lake
called Mansovara, were first called Deveneggury (Devanâgarî)
or godlike people. Their written characters were also called Deveneggury
or Balbadha letters. A portion of them migrated to the North and settled
there, and afterwards spread towards the South, while others went to
the West. All these emigrants styled themselves Âryans, or noble,
pure, and good men, as they considered that a pure gift had been made
to humanity from the "Pure Alone." These lofty souls were
the authors of the Vedas.
What more reasonable than the claim that such Scriptures, emanating from
such authors, should contain, for those who are able to penetrate the
meaning that lies half concealed under the dead letter, all the wisdom
which it is allowed to men to acquire on earth? The Chiefs of the Ârya
Samâj discredit "miracles," discountenance superstition
and all violation of natural law, and teach the purest form of Vaidic
Philosophy. Such are the allies of the Theosophical Society. They have
said to us: "Let us work together for the good of mankind,"
and we will.
H. P. BLAVATSKY. |